The phrase "allocation rules for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing guidelines or principles related to the distribution of resources or responsibilities.
Example: "The allocation rules for the budget must be clearly defined to ensure fairness among departments."
Alternatives: "distribution guidelines for" or "resource allocation criteria for".
Subsequently, a correlation measure named lift is utilized to annotate the negatively correlated resource allocation rules for resource reservation.
In this paper, we look at several measures of selection quality and derive respective allocation rules for the multi-objective computing budget allocation problem.
In Béal et al. (forthcoming) two new axioms of invariance, called Addition invariance and Transfer invariance respectively, are introduced to design allocation rules for TU-games.
In particular, when IZ is introduced into the MOCBA framework, we address how to determine the probability of non-dominance, how to define the Pareto set, and how to derive allocation rules for the simulation replications.
Different allocation rules for both somatic and mental health care create another barrier.
In my view, despite the documented inconsistencies, this stream of literature lends some support to the role of stakeholders and their preferences in helping to shape allocation rules for scarce medical resources.
The purpose of the present work is to provide a sequential two-treatment allocation rule for when the response variables are continuous.
But whereas the treatment allocation rule in Markovian group up-and-down designs is only based on information from the current cohort of subjects, the treatment allocation rule for the proposed design is based on the cumulative information at the current dose.
The design problem here is to determine an optimal allocation rule for the experimental units with known covariate(s) into two treatments such that both treatment and covariate effects, or only treatment effect, are efficiently estimated in terms of the commonly used D- or A-optimalities.
Further arguing that based on these premises donor selection criteria for islet transplantation and hence allocation rules (pancreas for whole organ or islet transplant) may need to be redefined.
We consider emissions- and output-based allocation rules which allow for updating of the basis of allocation over time and thereby do not rely on historical data only.
