The phrase "allocation of the programme" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the distribution or assignment of resources, tasks, or responsibilities within a specific program or project.
Example: "The allocation of the programme's budget will determine how effectively we can implement our initiatives this year."
Alternatives: "distribution of the programme" or "assignment of the programme".
At a press conference held after the visits, the President of the Commission Ms. Ljiljana Popovska called for increased state budgetary allocations for the programmes assisting victims of domestic violence.
Third, the window of time was also modified to assess whether results remained consistent when studying only the last decade .29Results seem to hold, with the exception of the implementation variables timing and the interactions of the allocation of resources to programme administration with the policy variables that become highly significant for the unemployment rate.
The present allocations of the national programmes currently amount to €754 million (shared management), while €342 million is managed by the Commission through annual work programmes focusing on union action, emergency assistance and technical assistance at the Commission's initiative (direct or indirect management).
In terms of implementation, the analysis finds that the allocation of resources to programme administration has favourable effects and that a disruption of policy continuity is associated with negative effects for all labour market variables analysed.
Raising the allocation of resources to programme administration has a reducing effect on the unemployment rate, either directly or through its interaction with policy variables.
In addition, the interaction term between training and the allocation of resources to programme administration is significant and positively correlated, illustrating that as more resources are allocated towards PES and administration, the favourable effect of training on the overall and low-skilled employment rates becomes stronger.
The former approach is useful in assessing the allocation of programme resources and their opportunity costs, i.e. determining whether these resources could be used more productively elsewhere, whereas the latter cost estimates are helpful to national planners in assessing programme affordability.
To avoid unmasking of the assessors, participants will be instructed not to refer to their group allocation, the programme or their use of the tablet.
Likewise, the impact of implementation variables shows the mirror image of unemployment rate estimations; yet, in this case, the allocation of resources to programme administration has a positive and significant effect on the employment rate of both population groups (albeit only at the 10% level for the overall group).
In terms of implementation, results show that the allocation of resources to programme administration has favourable effects on labour market variables either directly or through its interaction with training policies.
For example, an increase by one percentage point in the allocation of resources to programme administration would be associated with a decrease of 0.1 percentage points in the overall unemployment rate, and an increase by around 0.1 and 0.2 percentage points in the low-skilled employment rate and LFPR, respectively.
