The phrase "allocation of subjects" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts such as education, research, or project management where subjects or topics need to be assigned or distributed among individuals or groups.
Example: "The allocation of subjects for the upcoming seminar will be determined by the interests of the participants."
Alternatives: "distribution of topics" or "assignment of subjects".
There is an element of chance in the allocation of subjects for debate in Westminster Hall.
We present schemes for the allocation of subjects to treatment groups, in the presence of prognostic factors.
Stemming from this theoretical framework are a number of results and some further development, in particular the way to structure a randomized allocation of subjects as well as a more robust approach to the problem of dealing with patient heterogeneity.
Allocation of subjects in clinical trials operates in the presence of two conflicting goals: the allocation procedure should limit the number of subjects allocated to the inferior treatment while simultaneously obtaining sufficient information from the subjects about the relative efficacies of the treatments.
They also highlight the issues with defining rodent models of complex diseases like autism spectrum disorders and schizophrenia, as well as the complexity of experimental design, for instance when deciding the appropriate allocation of subjects to experimental groups when dealing with whole-litter manipulations in rodents.
We used Microsoft Excel to generate a list of random numbers for the allocation of subjects to one of the four study arms.
The majority of the studies utilized some form of random allocation of study subjects.
Then, the selection of the required number of children was from the selected households with proportional allocation of study subjects.
Allocation of study subjects into the respective groups envisaged equal distribution of both the nursing home residents and former geriatric ward patients.
We then explored different methods of analysis of the restricted cohort, using a conventional regression model, propensity score analysis, and instrumental variable analysis, to adjust for potential confounding factors and selection bias due to non-random allocation of study subjects.
Reporting adequacy was evaluated using an instrument that uses five criteria to identify potential causes of biases [ 9, 10]: i) Formation of study groups-allocation of subjects between the control and intervention groups, ii) Unit of allocation and analysis, iii) Baseline differences between study groups, iv) Type of outcome measure, and v) Completeness of follow-up.
