The phrase "allocation of stem" is not correct and lacks clarity in written English.
It may be used in contexts related to resource distribution or management, but it requires additional context to convey a clear meaning.
Example: "The allocation of stem cells for research purposes is a critical aspect of medical advancements."
Alternatives: "distribution of stem" or "assignment of stem".
After 20 weeks of treatment, we collected data on morphological indexes of shoot height, root collar diameter, total leaf area and total root area; measured photosynthetic rate (A sat), transpiration rate (E), photosynthetic water-use efficiency (WUE) and apparent chlorophyll concentration (Chl); harvested seedlings and measured biomass allocation of leaf, stem and root.
AS Allocation Fraction of Stems (= 0.3).
Nevertheless, data sets such as these, allowing comparisons of allocation to stems and leaves in lianas and trees in situ, are generally consistent with Darwin's hypothesis showing greater leaf mass ratios and therefore lower stem mass ratios and reduced support costs in lianas.
Allocation of the CFP stem to a patient is not influenced by this trial.
Likewise, in pot-grown 2-year-old Wisteria floribunda (Fabaceae), availability of support caused an increase in relative allocation to stems and a decrease in allocation to roots, but no effect on allocation to leaves (Sakai and Suzuki, 1999).
Assuming that breeding changes only allocation of dry matter, from stem to ear, a hypothetical grain Miscanthus could produce as much seed as maize and still have the capacity to invest in 12 Mg ha−1 of stalk.
The model is designed to enable an assessment of the relative impact of formal authority that stems from allocation of decision rights and informal authority that stems from individual power and influence.
Under the semi-natural outdoor conditions (Experiment 2), seeding density had little influence on biomass allocation traits, survival (SUR) and number of stem units (NSU), but high effects in dry weight (DW), specific leaf area (SLA), ontogenetic change (HON3) and height (HTOT).
That is, practitioners operating at different administrative levels have significantly different opinions on nature conservation system performance, system effectiveness, the distribution of power among actors, and on the allocation of costs and benefits stemming from nature conservation.
