Sentence examples for allocation of respondents from inspiring English sources

For this Phase II trial an attempt was made to blind the researcher to the allocation of respondents until the end of the intervention period (week 8).

No statistically significant differences were found between the allocations of respondents in the highest socioeconomic grades and those of respondents in the lower grades.

The upscaling resulted in allocation of 48 respondents into the 'frequent organic' consumption group, of which three were vegetarians.

According to the literature, cognitive impairments are the major reason for non-random allocation of survey respondents between proxy-reports and patient-reports.

This resulted in the upscaling of 1066 subjects, and the re-allocation of 63 respondents into a 'frequent organic' consumption group.

KG without awareness of respondents' allocations, undertook the analysis.

However, none of the coefficients for the interactions between personal experience and the scenario dummies were statistically significant, which suggests that, although personal experience was a driver of respondents' overall allocation choices, it did not affect the way in which their allocation choices were influenced by information about government spending decisions in the various scenarios.

Research staff involved in the trial will not be informed of respondents' group allocation during interventions or at follow-up.

Approximately two thirds of respondents reported allocations of one or two trainees, with few being allocated more than four (Table  6).

The majority of respondents reported allocations of either less than one hour or 1 3 hours per week, with few indicating time allocations of 3 or more hours per week (Table  5).

Two thirds of respondents reported allocations of between one and three undergraduate medical students, with few being allocated more than six (Table  6).> -wrap-foot>> -wrap-foot> Number of respondents indicating yes or no.