The phrase "allocation of exposure" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to finance, risk management, or resource distribution where exposure refers to the potential risk or investment in a particular area.
Example: "The allocation of exposure across various asset classes is crucial for managing investment risk effectively."
Alternatives: "distribution of risk" or "assignment of exposure".
The use of prospectively identified patients with psoriasis ensured a rational basis for allocation of exposure time and, due to the very large sample size, did not imply any significant loss of information.
Many of the participants from the two workshops contributed advice throughout the project, particularly regarding selection of appropriate risk estimates and allocation of exposure levels to industry sectors.
The first key feature, "controlled exposure," reflects the ability of experimental studies in humans and animals to largely eliminate confounding by randomizing allocation of exposure.
In fact, respondent women might be different from never-respondent women because of the so-called 'self-selection bias': those screened have elected to be screened whereas those never screened (after the invitation) have refused the offer to be screened, thereby introducing a self-selection bias into the allocation of exposure (Cuzick et al, 1997).
To obtain an accurate allocation of exposure time, people who developed rheumatoid arthritis contributed with time at risk in the reference group until the rheumatoid arthritis index date; that is, outcomes before the index date would be allocated to the reference group.
We used propensity score analyses [ 12, 13] to balance measurable confounders and risk factors between the exposure groups defined by day of admission to account for the non-random allocation of the exposures.
Randomized controlled trial (RCT) is widely considered to be the most reliable design because of the randomized allocation of the exposures.
The order of group allocation to exposure type was the same each year, except in 2008 where order of testing for two groups was changed twice due to changing wind conditions.
From a Bayesian perspective, the estimates of the propensity score are posterior probabilities to predict the allocation to exposure (X = t) under Z = z [ 32].
Of further concern is that, when revising the nickel guideline, the WHO increased the allocation for exposure from drinking water from 10to20%0 %, effectively doubling the guideline [ 94, 95].
The research aims to address the clinical question through a randomised controlled trial of low versus standard dialysate [Na+], while observing the effect of allocation and exposure upon participant's LV mass, an accepted surrogate outcome for CV mortality in end-stage kidney disease populations [ 12, 22, 23, 36, 122].
