Sentence examples for allocation of expenses from inspiring English sources

The trial, which began in Riverside, Calif., in the spring, six years after Celador first filed a lawsuit, offered a rare window into so-called Hollywood accounting — the allocation of expenses and revenue on a film or television project and a frequent area of dispute between studios and their partners.

Note 2: The year-on-year and sequential decreases in operating expenses resulted from the proportionate allocation of operating expenses being impacted by the relative mix of sales and gross profit performance between Mobile Phones and Smart Devices, resulting in lower relative allocations to Smart Devices in the first quarter 2012.

Note 2: The year-on-year and sequential increases in operating expenses resulted from the proportionate allocation of operating expenses being impacted by the relative mix of  sales and gross profit performance between Mobile Phones and Smart Devices, resulting in higher relative allocations to Mobile Phones in the first quarter 2012.

It is also worth noting that the net revenue figures for athletic departments over all, which include women's sports and reduce the potential for massaging the allocation of general expenses across programs, look considerably worse, as do the numbers for men's programs outside the F.B.S.

These year-on-year and sequential changes resulted, in addition to the factors described below, from the proportionate allocation of operating expenses being impacted by the relative mix of sales and gross profit performance between Mobile Phones and Smart Devices.

A larger number of DRGs allows for a more nuanced allocation of patients at the expense of complexity and greater potential for unintended incentives, where clinically and financially optimal treatment diverges.

But part of the allocation would include at least three years of expenses in short-term bonds.

Since profit from the production of U.S.-made widgets gets the break, but profit from the servicing of those same widgets doesn't, the IRS will have to write all sorts of rules about the allocations of income and expenses.

Our results suggest that the interaction of lower P availability in Taylor River relative to Shark River basin, along with higher sulfide and permanent flooding account for higher allocation of belowground biomass and production, at expenses of aboveground growth and wood biomass.

Thus, the best user is better off with the change to BC allocation at the expenses of users with lower average SNR.

That’s after 0.4% of expenses.