The phrase "allocation in favour of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where resources, funds, or support are being designated or assigned to a particular person, group, or cause.
Example: "The committee approved an allocation in favour of the local charity to support their community programs."
Alternatives: "allocation for the benefit of" or "allocation supporting".
Change of growth allocation in favour of small or tall trees can modify the mode of mortality (i.e. the size distribution of the dying trees) and the stand structure.
This has resulted in strong support for legislative and policy development and resource allocation in favour of children and women.
Selecting a value 1/2 < p < 1 will bias allocation in favour of the preferred treatment whilst retaining an element of randomness so that patient allocation cannot be predicted.
Fertilization as well as shading increased allocation in favour of aboveground plant organs [higher LAR, smaller RS R Supporting Information Figs S1K and L and S2K and L, Table 3].
In addition to a frontal attack on civil liberties, the government has redistributed economic assets (particularly through the tax system and investment allocations) in favour of interest groups close to Fidesz and a restricted layer of the well-to-do.
This test case will precipitate many others, says her lawyer, though councils can still tip housing allocations in favour of locals by allowing more points to longest inhabitants in the district.
Ghana's Ministry of Health has an existing deprived area incentive scheme to attract, retain and sustain staff in rural areas including discriminatory fellowship allocations in favour of those working in deprived areas and a reduced period for promotion by 1 year [ 36].
Sometimes, from ethical considerations, the goal may be to skew the allocation pattern in favour of the better treatment.
For others, preparing hagiographic documents is a day job, the way they make a living.To mitigate the danger of favouring only the rich, the Cardinal's department already exercises some positive discrimination (in its allocation of time) in favour of proposals from less well-off countries, and it welcomes voluntary donations to support the cost of poor-world applications.
It is also acknowledged that even if this was achieved, if a single measure was chosen, it could bias the allocation of resources in favour of some diseases or interventions that have impact on the particular attributes of that measure.
Their allocation is weighted heavily in favour of large corporations, and the fishermen with smaller boats say that they are simply not allowed to catch enough to survive.
