Sentence examples for allocation has a from inspiring English sources

Efficient resource allocation has a positive impact on the service provider's profitability.

At the same time, the power loading in a multiuser system only slightly affects performance while the initial subcarrier allocation has a rather big impact.

Unlike in the previous section, where both power allocation and prices have a direct influence on whether the utility requirements are fulfilled, only the power allocation has a direct influence on the fulfillment of the rate requirements.

The computational complexity and traffic of the proposed techniques are investigated, and it is shown that using PSO for subcarrier allocation has a lower complexity than the techniques in the literature.

Since the optimization problem of centralized resource allocation has a large and complex search space, genetic algorithm (GA) is implemented to obtain near-optimal solutions with a relatively fast convergence speed.

At least a junior medical staff is present in each unit and the nursing allocation has a 1 2 ratio.

Water in this catchment is operated by and in the interests of society, where decisions on its allocation have a political perspective to them.

People benefiting from an allocation have a greater chance of getting a monitorat; this trend is confirmed by the recent decision of the government to link allocations and the monitorat, so that eventually only those with an allocation will have access to a monitorat.

It was found there that compared to the impact of host genetic potentials for growth and resistance, genetically determined nutrient allocation had a relatively small impact on observed growth and immune response.

Subjects on the treatment allocation had a 3% decrease in homocysteine concentration, while for those in the control allocation had a 7% increase, a difference that was not significant (P=0.096); for folate, the respective changes were a 123% increase and a 8% increase (P=2 × 10−6); and for vitamin B12, a 11% increase and a 7% decrease (P=0.0044).

For insulin, subjects on the treatment allocation had a 27% increase, while those on the control allocation had a 18% increase, a difference that was not significant; for FFA, the respective changes were a 18% reduction and 10% increase (P=0.013); for triglycerides, a 15% reduction and a 1% decrease (P=0.11); and glucose concentrations were unaffected by the intervention.