The phrase "allocation figures" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing numerical data related to the distribution of resources, budgets, or other quantifiable items.
Example: "The allocation figures for the upcoming fiscal year indicate a significant increase in funding for education."
Alternatives: "distribution numbers" or "resource allocation data".
Comparisons of root allocation (figure 1), showed that kin groups allocated less to their fine root mass than did stranger groups in shared pots (n=96, t=2.71, p<0.0081; figure 1 a).
For BE (Figure 8), the minimum resource guarantee approach results in higher throughput for the proposed scheme while other methods show lower throughput with loaded users because they treat BE at lowest priority for resource allocation (Figure 8). Figure 7 Throughput comparison for proposed scheme with CBR traffic at 150 kbps and resource allocation of 100% in 10-MHz bandwidth.
Users with single transmit antenna can observe a performance improvement of approximately 6 dB, while users with two transmit antennas can benefit from an approximately 4-dB gain, when compared with the performance achieved with fixed subchannel allocation (Figure 2). Figure 4 SER performance TR-STC-GFDMA assuming random selection priority.
The reluctance to leave the choice of analgesia to chance was also seen after consent and allocation (Figure 1).
Nitrogen addition did not change live belowground biomass but greatly decreased proportional root allocation (Figure 3B, D), presumably to compete for light [53].
A trade-off was observed, however, as some of the ecoregions highly threatened from land conversion become relatively less important under the climate-adapted allocation (Figure 6c).
There was only a weak relationship if any with the NHS R&D support funding allocation (figure 1, spearman rank correlation 0.33).
Patients will be followed up at 6 months at a face-to-face interview with a research assistant who will be blinded to treatment allocation (figure 1).
When pooling our results with those of Nuesch et al, 1 who performed a meta-epidemiological study with continuous outcomes as well, we obtained a pooled statistically significant value (ES=0.14; 95% CI 0.02 to 0.26), meaning that trials with inappropriate concealment of allocation had more beneficial effect than trials with appropriate concealment of allocation (figure 6).
The public manipulation changed aggregate point allocations (Figure 2).
