Sentence examples for allocation excluding from inspiring English sources

Still, relative to other departments, the Health and Children Ministerial Group's proportion of total budgetary allocation (excluding funds spent on welfare payment through Social Protection), grew between 2008 and 2011, suggesting a form of relative protection of health expenditure.

The DRR allocations (excluding rehabilitation and reconstruction) by the Indonesian government has seen significantly annual increases with a total of USD 6.4 billion allocated for the period 2006 2012, about 25 times more than total international commitments to DRR in Indonesia in the 30 years from 1980 (Gordon 2013).

The primary analysis was performed by applying a logistic regression model on the full analysis set using all allocation factors excluding study center (chemotherapy treatment, sex and age) as covariates to estimate the difference in the overall CR rate between the two groups (study treatment group − control group) and its two-sided Wald-type 95% confidence interval (CI).

In analyses concerning efficacy, those patients found to have either 1- or 4-walled intrabony defect during surgery after allocation were excluded.

Exclusion of studies with a high risk or unclear risk of bias in either the random allocation schedule or allocation concealment fields; Continuous data: excluding studies where assumptions about SDs had to be made because they were missing.

We anticipate performing the following separate sensitivity analyses: Exclusion of studies with a high risk or unclear risk of bias in either the random allocation schedule or allocation concealment fields; Continuous data: excluding studies where assumptions about SDs had to be made because they were missing.

First, while we describe rapid changes in treatment source concurrent with changes in funding allocation we cannot exclude important unmeasured factors that determine ART delivery.

Quasi-random study designs, such as those using alternate allocation, will be excluded.

This meant that households established after land allocation were automatically excluded from payment schemes.

Instead, studies with "unknown" risk of bias on "random sequence" and "allocation concealment" were excluded in a sensitivity analysis that showed a comparable HR of 0.92 (95%% CI 0.84 1.02) (Fig.  7).

Therefore, we cannot exclude allocation bias as the most likely reason for observing this higher cancer rate in insulin glargine only users and, similarly, the slightly lower rate in those using non-glargine plus glargine insulin.