The phrase "allocation compared with the" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the differences or similarities between an allocation and another variable or benchmark.
Example: "The allocation compared with the previous year's budget shows a significant increase in funding for education."
Alternatives: "allocation in relation to the" or "allocation versus the".
Thus, we show that substantial energy savings can be achieved in video decoding by employing dynamic core allocation, compared with the default strategy of allocating as many cores as available.
Figure 4 Tradeoff between reduced complexity and performance degradation of the CDIT-based allocation compared with the perfect CSIT.
Figure 9 Trade-off between feedback reduction and performance degradation of the CDI-based allocation compared with the perfect CSIT-based allocation.
Our analyses revealed that expected species loss from "protected" areas due to climate change was reduced by 22 percent on average in the climate-adapted allocation, compared with the climate-neutral allocation.
Briefly, the allocation is set separately for every possible biomarker profile in proportion to the posterior probabilities from the Bayesian model; as the trial progresses, the increasing amount of evidence accumulated results in a potentially quite different allocation compared with the start.
Ydanis Rodriguez, a councilman from working-class Upper Manhattan who is a touch independent, received a vanishingly small allocation compared with, say, the Quinn ally Jessica S. Lappin, on the wealthy Upper East Side.
We have also found that our CGP algorithm scales with about the same order of complexity as the other methods, though since those methods employ a closed-form power allocation compared with our iterative algorithm, the constant on the highest order complexity term for the other methods is smaller than for our CGP method.
Only 55.3% (n = 42) women in the SC group were satisfied with the group allocation compared with 84.4% (n = 65) in the MA group and 88.8% (n = 71) in the EA group.
In total, 230/254 (91%) women in the outpatient group received their randomised allocation compared with 206/253 (81%) in the inpatient group (fig 1).
In this study, the ICSA shows its effectiveness to optimize resource allocation compared with other existing resource allocation algorithms.
Therefore, a potential mismatch in the underlying issues that shape preferences regarding organ allocation compared with healthcare professionals and policy makers may be overlooked.
