The phrase "allocating scores" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you are distributing or assigning numerical values or ratings to items, individuals, or performances.
Example: "The committee is responsible for allocating scores to each participant based on their performance in the competition."
Alternatives: "assigning scores" or "distributing scores".
The team were subsequently brought together with a Chair to discuss their findings for each agreement, allocating scores for each of five criteria: agreement negotiation; appropriateness, environmental effectiveness, compliance and side effects.
In better words, as within the cooperative learning environments, the participants are responsible for the learning of the entire group, hence allocating scores partially proportional to the individual attempts within groups would be in no way in conflict with the aims and scope of the cooperative learning principles practiced in higher order thinking domain.
This paper explores the challenges faced by multidisciplinary teams in allocating scores on standardised outcome measures in clinical practice.
We also explored what was being disputed when discussion was necessary in the process of allocating scores to patients.
In this paper, we explore how a multidisciplinary team of clinicians achieved the task of allocating scores to patients using a series of standardised outcome measures.
Allocating scores on the standardised outcome measures used in the Churchtown Centre required knowledge about many different aspects of the patient's abilities and problems, which was determined by and reflected in the different types of work that team members did with patients by virtue of their professional background.
The differences in the frequency of T185 and S185 isoforms between the groups were evaluated after allocating score 0 to the T185 allele and score 1 to the S185 allele.
Results showed a strong agreement across participants' allocated scores.
With attention to allocated scores by prioritization models, crops cultivation priority was determined as maize, rape and soybean in land units, respectively and maize crop was preferred to other plants.
The current adaptation measures in the area, with the perceived level of importance of the each of strategies, were analysed, from the data which required respondents to allocate scores based on a Likert scale of 0 3 as done by Ndamani and Watanabe (2015).
The four countries in this study were allocated scores on the two potentially relevant dimensions (Individualism and Power Distance) of Hofstede's system [9] — the scores for Northern Ireland, a culturally divided region of the United Kingdom were averaged from those of the U.K. and Ireland, which are already similar.
