The phrase "allocated weight" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where weight is assigned or distributed to different items, categories, or factors, often in technical, scientific, or analytical discussions.
Example: "In the study, each factor was given an allocated weight to determine its impact on the overall results."
Alternatives: "assigned weight" or "designated weight".
Let denote the allocated weight for user, then the weighted-sum of rates based power allocation problem can be mathematically posed as (8a).
Consequently the task force voted to allocate these candidates weight 0.25 while candidates A, B, C2, F, G were allocated weight 1.0 in the determination of the new IGRF-11 model for epoch 2010.
This shows how the allocated weight falls dramatically as the frequency increases from zero.
If participants were still attending their allocated weight loss intervention at programme end, the service providers weighed them and provided this data to the research team.
This implies that when heterogeneity is present, even a very large new study may have very little (even zero – see below) power to change statistical inferences in a meta-analysis since its allocated weight will be relatively small, and inevitably under-powered in the meta-analysis framework (even though it could have considerable power when analysed on its own).
The participants who reported continuing to use the methods from their allocated weight loss programme had lost weight (0.57 (5.6) kg) from programme end to the one year follow-up, whereas those who had changed to another method had gained 1.17 (5.6) kg and those who had stopped trying to lose weight had gained 1.18 (6.0) kg (P=0.01).
The task force therefore voted to allocated weights of 0.5 to A, E and G with the remaining candidates B, C, D, F, H allocated weights of 1.0 for the construction of final IGRF-11 SV-2010-2015 model.
Figure 2 illustrates this weighting function for a value of f = 20, showing that allocated weights fall more gradually with the parabolic function than for the approximately inverse square root function previously used.
Hence, it is acknowledged that, on the basis of the stochastic approach adopted, some of the allocated weights selected from the distributional ranges used may have been the result of inconsistent comparisons.
It will be challenging how to allocate weights of star-based ratings and text-based ratings.
As indicated in the method, we regard research to provide a basis for allocating weights to the components of link quality an avenue for further research.
