Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The C-GHQ scoring (possible range 0 – 12) is an adaptation of the standard scoring method, with the positively worded items scored 0-0-1-1 0-0-1-1 0-0-1-1 0-0-1-1ing method, asd the negatinely worded ithestandardascoringxamethodbove, andocathe a scorinegatively of 0-1-1-1.
Similar(59)
Where there is incredible data from our tables (that is data that isn't actually credible, rather than anything that made us gasp) we have allocated a score in the nearest (ie highest or lowest) band.
Each genomic position was allocated a score equal to the number of reads beginning at that position.
Each performed behaviour was allocated a score of 1, and the total for each dog was used to generate a reactivity index.
If 20% of the population are in the next highest group, social class II, then this social class is allocated a score 0.20 (0.1+0.2/2) and so on.
Regarding the behavioural score, a Reactivity Index was determined by calculating the total number of manifested behaviours (each manifested response was allocated a score of 1) for each dog and for each stimulus over the first 7 presentations.
Three independent reviewers allocated a score of methodological quality.
Inefficient health centres are allocated a score that is less than 1 (or 100%).
Coders identified relevant statements on the transcript and allocated a score under one or more categories.
To compare changes with time, we allocated a score to each possible clinical skill outcome.
The ordinal scale responses were allocated a score to allow the calculation of means.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com