The phrase "alleged information" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to information that is claimed or asserted to be true but has not been proven or verified.
Example: "The report contained alleged information about the company's financial practices that required further investigation."
Alternatives: "purported information" or "claimed information".
A spokesman said: "An internal investigation is currently under way into an alleged information security incident.
No "sensitive information" - a category defined so broadly as to include "alleged information" - could be used in any case involving MI5 and MI6 and their relations with foreign spooks, the CIA in particular.
By contrast, in its central uses, telling requires a speaker to intend to convey information (or alleged information) in a way that relies crucially upon taking her at her word.
The inset in figure 2D illustrates this dependence on the amount of data and shows the alleged information capacity estimated at zero contrast as a function of the number of trials evaluated.
"FCC staff reviews each complaint to determine whether it alleges information sufficient to suggest that a violation of the obscenity, profanity or indecency prohibition has occurred," the organization's website explains.
"The S.E.C. will have to separate out the alleged inside information from just market noise if they want to win this case," said Peter J. Henning, a law professor at Wayne State University who studies white-collar crime and is not involved in this case.
Rancourt alleged this information was barred from the court, but Judge Larry Smuckler later claimed that the issue was not barred, and that Carney simply did not pursue the angle at trial.
In 1997, Nel dropped the charges, alleging new information had come to light and a key witness - the middleman who handled the bribe - had died.
Lawyers for the Lloyds Action Now campaign group have written to former chancellor Alistair Darling, Blank – who was chairman when the deal was brokered in the autumn of 2008 – and Daniels, alleging vital information about HBOS's finances was omitted from the prospectus on which they were asked to vote to save the stricken lender.
The claim, formally lodged last week, alleges that information obtained from Ms Huthart's mobile phone while she was working in the States led to the publication of two stories in The Sun and one in the defunct News of the World in April and May 2005.
She turned out to be Danielle Chiesi, a consultant to a Bear Stearns hedge fund, who the government alleges supplied information to Rajaratnam and others.
