Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(5)
The phrase "alleged error" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a mistake or fault that has been claimed or asserted but not yet proven.
Example: "The court is reviewing the case to determine whether the alleged error had any impact on the final verdict."
Alternatives: "claimed mistake" or "supposed error".
Exact(11)
But Ashley ignores this information, and goes on to explain the business' alleged error to the dispatcher, who remains patient throughout. .
This does not show that purists are only human and sometimes make errors; it shows that the alleged error is not an error.
Board officials said that because of the alleged error, about 60,000 students were given higher scores than they deserved on the test of 50 multiple-choice questions.
Suárez, despite any mistakes he might have made, is the preferred target of certain media, of certain press, who give him much more coverage for an alleged error he might have made rather than the things for which he is really in football".
The definition of professional responsibility as integrating these two aspects, on one hand the pride of developing its own expertise and on the other to face accusations of alleged error or misconduct, helps to overcome the dilemma.
For the record: comScore hasn't given any statements regarding the alleged error yet, but Yahoo says the measurement company is committed to issuing the correct numbers in the company's next data release.
Similar(49)
Other evidence commissioned by the inquiry identifies alleged errors in decisions made by senior officers.
As for grad students' concerns that Kipnis' alleged errors in her first essay would have a "chilling" effect, preventing other students from reporting assaults to Northwestern, neither side seems to find common ground.
On Thursday, Central Valley opponents filed suit to obtain a restraining order on the project, alleging errors in the authority's environmental impact statement for the Fresno-to-Bakersfield section.
A court challenge to the project to be heard Oct. 1 alleges errors by the Joint Review Panel (JRP) and NEB Governor In Council (GIC), as well as breaches of the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act and the Species At Risk Act, and raises concerns about the adequacy of Crown consultations in the context of First Nations land title.
Nobody has alleged wrongdoing.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com