Sentence examples for all three formulas from inspiring English sources

The calibration coefficients in the three formulas are improved using a least-squares optimization algorithm, resulting in a significant improvement in the predictive skill of all three formulas.

Finally, in Leonhard Euler's Introduction to Analysis of the Infinite (1748), the series π/4 = 1 − 1/3 + 1/5 − 1/7 +⋯ is transformed into Brouncker's continued fraction, showing that all three formulas are in some sense the same.

Proof All three formulas are direct consequences of Theorem 5.1, supplied with (11), (12), Theorems 2.6 and 5.1.

It would be rather exhausting to cite (M_{1}) or (M_{2}), nevertheless all three formulas are applied in conditions that are particular cases of (9) for h satisfying (3a - 3e).

Now x=x is coextensive with both (x=x & E x) and (E!x → x=x), since all three formulas are satisfied by all members of D. Hence if co-extensive open formulas could be exchanged salva veritate, (t=t & E t) and (E t → t=t) would have the same truth value as t=t.

All three formulas accurately corrected for backgrounds to 0.025 mg of C in the aerosol standard (NIST SRM 1648a).

All three formulae were derived from non-critically ill populations, and imply certain relationships between measures of body size (weight or BSA) and the production of cystatin C or creatinine.

GI symptoms (ie, regurgitation, vomiting, diarrhea, constipation, and abdominal pain characterized by prolonged crying) were the most common reason for study discontinuation in all three formula groups: 14.3% of infants in the control group, 17.2% in the IF-BMOS group and 13.3% in the IF-BMOS + Pro group discontinued due to GI symptoms.

For all four formulas, a larger bias and a lower precision were observed in ARC group (Table 2).

All six formulas were correlated with the PINI (0.78 < R < 0.94, P < 0.0001).

For all four formulas, a larger bias and a lower precision were observed in ARC group (Table  2).