The phrase "all this variability" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the presence of diverse or fluctuating elements in a particular context, such as data, behavior, or conditions.
Example: "In our research, we observed all this variability in the results, which made it challenging to draw definitive conclusions."
Alternatives: "all this diversity" or "all this fluctuation".
All this variability makes it extremely tough to convert those thousands of idiosyncratic fruits into baggies of uniform, ultrareliable snacks.
It is difficult for those developing and designing internet of things components to effectively predict and accommodate all this variability.
Alternatively, while we show here that females display similar levels of discriminable variability in coloration not all this variability may be equally informative of individual quality.
All of this variability is what makes the geography of happiness so fascinating: Despite our deeply personal differences and definitions of what brings us pleasure (or what saps it), strong patterns emerge across the country when we ask people to describe their own wellbeing.
All of this variability competes with other meteorological influences, geomagnetic activity, and solar flux changes to produce the ionospheric variability that undermines operation of various communications and navigation systems.
The existing studies of sleep deprivation have generated variable results; small sample size, differences in the control of food-intake and physical activity levels, and inherent individual differences may have all contributed to this variability.
As the cell line used ensures single insertion of the transgene in the genome and similar expression levels in all cells studied, this variability in cell phenotypes could be indicative of an mtDNA segregation defect.
The estimated prevalence of MMBC is between 4 and 65% of all breast carcinomas; this variability is mainly due to lack of standardization in the gross examination and sampling of breast specimens [ 5, 6]; furthermore, sampling may be limited to the areas with suspicious macroscopic findings, or may be extensively performed, sometimes using whole mount sections.
However, this has been unable to account for all the variability and there is growing evidence that patient factors may significantly affect outcome.
In this sense, real approaches to speaker identification necessarily imply taking into account all these variability factors.
