The phrase "all these methodologies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to multiple methods or approaches that have been previously mentioned or are being discussed.
Example: "In our research, we evaluated all these methodologies to determine which one yielded the best results."
Alternatives: "all these methods" or "all these approaches".
The assembly of all these methodologies, in due time, should open the mixing arts to serious engineering analysis and predictability.
In the near future all these methodologies might be applied together routinely, even in time series examinations.
Current data and opinion support the use of a functional assay like the ELISPOT or ICS in combination with a phenotyping assay like HLA-multimers [ 26, 27], but recognized international standards for all these methodologies are still lacking.
The element common to all these methodologies is reflection.
The efficiency and accuracy of all these methodologies are verified by numerical examples.
All these methodologies can, in principle, be combined with the imaging and processing strategy reported here.
For many organizations, the best choice is all of these methodologies, blended together in a way that works well within that organization's constraints.
However, in all instances these methodologies will require consensus regarding evaluation which should also aim for quantitative analysis, for example, through image analysis.
Since all of these methodologies were not applied to the same biological materials, the performances are not homogeneously comparable, and the debate on the advantages and disadvantages of the different protocols still persists [ 14].
It is thus necessary to examine all these modelling methodologies, for the purpose of finding the appropriate modelling methodology to address specific questions regarding translation and translation regulation.
However, all these new methodologies require further validation and are still based on previous evaluations of parameter distributions.
