Ai Feedback
Exact(7)
Foer's position is that all such arguments are, finally, bogus.
Like all such arguments, this one is about power and satisfaction — who's going to get what.
The point, of course, is that all such arguments amount to committing the fallacy of composition.
Like all such arguments, this is one of those reverse-logic postulations which starts from the necessity to prove something and then manipulates the facts to fit, even to the extent of placing so many thousands of horrific deaths in the balance with a highly doubtful selection of what-ifs and letting the what-ifs win.
Even if all such arguments fail, this would still not in itself be a convincing overall case against hedonism.
What all such arguments do is attempt to wed the idea of the ens realissimum with the notion of necessary existence.
Similar(49)
Bhāviveka, Candrakīrti and Śāntideva all leveled such arguments.
When argued for in the third way it is not now commonly referred to as "fatalism" at all, and such arguments will not be discussed here.
My spouse is a first-grade teacher who works with kids between the ages of six and seven, hears such "arguments" all the time, and was in complete agreement with Anderson Cooper.
Ultimately, most arguments are essentially about power, and in settling such arguments all else is a secondary consideration.
Schlosser knows such arguments all too well but he doesn't accept that there's nothing that can be done.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com