The phrase "all statute" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to "all statutes" or "all statutory provisions," which would be appropriate in legal contexts.
Example: "The new regulations apply to all statutes governing environmental protection."
Alternatives: "all laws" or "all legal provisions".
As Julian Borger reported in August: The Guardian's lawyers believed the government might either seek an injunction under the law of confidence, a catch-all statute that covers any unauthorised possession of confidential material, or start criminal proceedings under the Official Secrets Act.
The notes indicate that Mr. Holder advised Mr. Quinn to publicize that he, on behalf of Mr. Rich, had agreed to waive all statute-of-limitation defenses should the government want to pursue Mr. Rich in civil court -- a concession made at President Clinton's urging.
She told Mr. Sessions that she had consistently acted "to vigorously defend all statutes, including the statute that embodies the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy".
In the United Kingdom, for example, all statutes, even those that are contrary to long-established constitutional principles, are formally binding and can be set aside only by subsequent statutes.
Yet, he also hopes for a time when religion can "be freed of all empirical grounds of determination, of all statutes that rest on history" (6:121).
Although in Part Three of Religion, he pines for a time when "religion will gradually be freed of all empirical grounds of determination, of all statutes that rest on history" (6:121), and "the pure faith of religion will rule over all" (6:121), he nevertheless recognizes that that time has not yet come.
Courts in the United Kingdom have stated that the precedent fact doctrine is not applicable to all statutes.
Kagan asserted that in both cases, she had acted "consistently with the responsibility which I agree with you very much that I have, to vigorously defend all statutes, including the statute that embodies the 'don't ask, don't tell' policy".
The Wisconsin Supreme Court placed special emphasis on the phrase "all statutes of the United States which affect Indians because of their status as Indians shall no longer be applicable to the members of the tribe, and the laws of the several States shall apply to the tribe and its members in the same manner as they apply to other citizens or persons within their jurisdiction".
All those statutes, together with the complex web of sentencing guidelines that apply to them, amount to a long and elaborate menu of charging options for prosecutors.
"The decision in this case will, in effect, determine the constitutionality of nearly all the statutes in force in the United States, limiting the hours of labor of adult women," Brandeis explained in his brief.
