Exact(10)
All population parameters were unbiased under all scenarios.
When shrinkage was low the MI method gave unbiased and precise estimates of all population parameters.
This method gave unbiased and precise estimates of all population parameters when data were MCAR or MAR.
All population parameters were estimated without any bias and with high precision when data were MCAR or MAR.
All population parameters were estimated with RSDs which were lower than the predefined limits, except CLfemale which had a RSD of 10% when data were MAR.
The more advanced methods (MI, MOD and EST) gave unbiased and precise estimates of all population parameters when data were MCAR or MAR.
Similar(50)
On the other hand, all tested population parameters significantly differed between regions where soil was collected.
Individual parameters from all subjects and population parameters are estimated simultaneously during a single parameter estimation run (in total, 2,358 parameters) using all available measurements of the total and labeled glucose concentrations.
Fig. 1 shows the prior and posterior distributions of all the estimated population parameters, and Fig. 2A shows the observed female population sizes, and the 95% confidence intervals on the population sizes when the population renewal process was simulated using parameter estimates drawn from those posteriors (Equations 3-5).
When the missing data were handled with the SIWT method, all estimates of the population parameters, except the estimates of the residual error, were biased.
The population renewal process was simulated by taking all the variability associated with the estimated population parameters into account.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com