The phrase "all pernicious" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that is harmful or destructive in a comprehensive or total sense.
Example: "The report highlighted the effects of all pernicious influences on society, emphasizing the need for reform."
Alternatives: "entirely harmful" or "completely destructive."
My point is not that these are all pernicious or reversible developments.
This kind of one-dimensional thinking blinds U.S. policymakers to the fact that Chavez's influence in Latin America is not all pernicious and, no matter how much it is hated, may be presenting solutions to Latin America's real problems in ways that Washington is not.
I gently suggested that these companies may have a point, and that "extreme" ideas should be protected under the principle of free speech, but Anna was adamant: it's all pernicious, because it's all part of the same recruitment drive.
Though all pernicious, one of the most perennial and resistant to change is the theme that Jews as a world community have surreptitiously accumulated inordinate power and wealth to manipulate and control the media, politicians, world economic systems, and the hearts and minds of populations on an international scale.
This sows the seeds for social unrest and all the pernicious transboundary effects that increasingly are arising therefrom, especially terrorist tendencies that threaten the U.S. and other advanced countries.
IT IS a pernicious threat, all the more so because, at its onset, it seems almost benign.
Causes of the deficiency include malabsorption of the vitamin (60% of all cases), pernicious anemia (15%20%% of all cases), and insufficient dietary intake.
Royal commissions were in effect abolished during the Thatcher years, but in the 1970s members were paid a modest daily allowance.This patchwork of small payments, or no payments at all, has a pernicious effect.
The writers said that the "growing attack" on the French language is "all the more pernicious because it is happening slowly".
Is this elision symptomatic of that notorious intolerance by omission that so often characterized the attitude of '60s "sexual revolutionaries" toward male homosexuality, and that was all the more pernicious for its resistance to exposure?
