The phrase "all our representations" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to all the ways in which something is presented or depicted, often in a formal or legal context.
Example: "We must ensure that all our representations in the contract are accurate and truthful."
Alternatives: "all our depictions" or "all our statements".
The principle in question simply states that the essence of I-hood lies in the assertion of ones own self-identity, i.e., that consciousness presupposes self-consciousness (the Kantian "I think," which must, at least in principle, be able to accompany all our representations).
Therefore, all our representations would present (darstellen) only a single object that would be neither spatial nor temporal, without parts, and immune to differentiation except for the inhibitions and oppositions that underlie the simple sensations of the particular senses in their mutual encounters in the psyche (SW VI: 115, e.g.; cf. Stout 1888b: 478).
The final condition of self-consciousness that Kant adds to the preceding conditions is that our understanding must cooperate with sensibility to construct one, unbounded, and unified space-time to which all of our representations may be related.
To see why this further condition is required, consider that so far we have seen why Kant holds that we must represent an objective world in order to be self-conscious, but we could represent an objective world even if it were not possible to relate all of our representations to this objective world.
All our solution representations contain activity lists as a substantial element.
First of all, in §§18 20 Kant makes significant assumptions about features of our representations of objects that exceed anything that he has argued for in §17 or earlier.
Our representations had 50 dimensions.
The world existed before humans and our representations, including our propositional representations.
Our representations of ourselves have been exhausted.
Specifically, what's foundationally important for Humean Empiricism is not anti-Nativism, but what we might call experientialism, the thesis that all our ideas are representations of particular sensory states.
We therefore urge the current president to take all necessary measures to equalize our representation on the court, and to actually put women in the majority for once.
