all members of

USAGE SUMMARY

"all members of" is a perfectly valid phrase and can be used in written English.
For example, "All members of the board of directors are expected to attend the meeting."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(Gleicheniaceae)—all members of Gleicheniales.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Not all members of the Chamber of Commerce agreed.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The appointments are all members of Scaf.

The Guardian

Not all members of the electorate agreed.

The New York Times

We are all members of each.

The New York Times - Arts

Our heartfelt condolences to all members of the bereaved families.

The New York Times

Our condolences to Doris and all members of the family.

The New York Times

All members of People Against Punning, look away now.

The New York Times - Arts

We're all members of a very inclusive club.

The Guardian - Opinion

Three accessories — all members of Bree's family — were also charged.

The New Yorker

Then again, we are all members of that family.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing, ensure the noun following the phrase "all members of" is singular and collective (e.g., "committee", "group", "family") or plural and countable (e.g., "students", "employees", "delegates").

Common error

Avoid using singular pronouns when referring back to "all members of" if the following noun is plural. For example, instead of "All members of the team should bring his equipment", write "All members of the team should bring their equipment".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all members of" functions as a determiner phrase, specifying that the entirety of a group is being referenced. This is supported by Ludwig's analysis confirming its correct grammatical usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

34%

Science

25%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Wiki

12%

Formal & Business

12%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "all members of" is a grammatically sound and commonly used phrase that serves to indicate the inclusion of every individual within a specific group. Ludwig confirms its proper usage across diverse contexts, from news articles to scientific papers. Analysis reveals its versatility in expressing unity, obligation, or shared characteristics. While suitable for various registers, it maintains a neutral tone. As Ludwig's examples demonstrate, ensure proper pronoun agreement to avoid grammatical errors.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

every member of

Replaces "all" with "every", emphasizing individual inclusion within the group.

each member of

Similar to "every member of", but may imply a more deliberate or sequential consideration of individuals.

every single member of

Adds emphasis to the inclusion of each and every individual.

the entirety of

Shifts focus to the group as a whole, rather than individual members.

the whole of

Similar to "the entirety of", emphasizing completeness and inclusion.

all constituents of

More formal, often used in technical or political contexts.

the complete roster of

Commonly used in organized scenarios such as sports or teams.

collectively, the members of

Focuses on the group's action or situation as a unit.

without exception, all in

Highlights the lack of exclusion, confirming the inclusion of every single member.

in its entirety, the group of

Highlights the all-encompassing nature of the group's involvement or status.

FAQs

How can I use "all members of" in a sentence?

The phrase "all members of" is used to indicate that every individual within a specific group is included or affected by something. For example, "All members of the committee were present at the meeting".

What are some alternatives to "all members of"?

You can use alternatives like "every member of", "each member of", or "the entirety of" depending on the context.

Is it grammatically correct to say "all member of"?

No, it is grammatically incorrect. The correct phrase is "all members of", as "members" should be plural to reflect that you are talking about more than one individual.

What is the difference between "all members of" and "most members of"?

"All members of" indicates that every single individual within a group is included, while "most members of" implies that the majority, but not necessarily everyone, is included.