all members

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'all members' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use 'all members' to refer to a group of people in a variety of contexts. For example, "All members of the club are invited to the meeting on Saturday."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(Gleicheniaceae)—all members of Gleicheniales.

BMC Evolutionary Biology

All members habitually cheat.

The Economist

All members were dead.

The New York Times

All members have equal weight.

The Economist

All members face lengthy jail sentences.

Independent

We communicate to all members regularly.

The New York Times - Magazine

Not all members of the Chamber of Commerce agreed.

Encyclopedia Britannica

But not all members felt that way.

The Guardian - Business

"All members were invited to comment.

The Guardian

The appointments are all members of Scaf.

The Guardian

Not all members of the electorate agreed.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "all members", ensure clarity by specifying the group to which the members belong, such as "all members of the committee" or "all members of the team".

Common error

Avoid using "all members" without specifying the relevant group, as this can lead to ambiguity. For example, instead of saying "all members agree", specify "all members of the board agree" to provide clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all members" functions as a determiner followed by a noun, specifying the entire collective of individuals belonging to a group. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and widely applicable. The phrase serves to define the scope of the statement to include every individual within the specified group.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

38%

Science

33%

Wiki

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Formal & Business

4%

Academia

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "all members" is a grammatically correct and versatile expression used to refer comprehensively to every individual within a specific group. Ludwig AI confirms its wide applicability across diverse contexts, including news, science, and general discussions. While its register is primarily neutral, the key is to ensure clarity by specifying the group to which the members belong. Alternatives such as "every member" or "each member" can provide nuanced emphasis, but "all members" remains a reliable and widely understood choice for conveying inclusivity and comprehensiveness.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

every member

Replaces "all" with "every", emphasizing individual inclusion rather than collective.

each member

Similar to "every member", but highlights individual consideration within the group.

the entire membership

Uses a noun phrase to denote the collective body of members.

every single member

Adds emphasis on the inclusion of each individual without exception.

all of the members

Adds "of the" for a slightly more formal tone, without changing the overall meaning.

the whole group

Generalizes the term to "group", applicable when referring to members of any collective.

the complete roster

More formal and specific, implying a list or record of all members.

without exception, every member

Emphasizes the lack of exceptions, making the statement more emphatic.

universally, members

Uses an adverb to convey the comprehensive nature of the membership.

inclusive of all members

Highlights the inclusive aspect, ensuring no member is excluded.

FAQs

How can I use "all members" in a sentence?

You can use "all members" to refer to every individual within a specific group. For example, "All members are invited to the annual meeting".

What phrases can I use instead of "all members"?

Alternatives include phrases like "every member", "each member", or "the entire membership", depending on the context and desired emphasis.

Is there a difference between "all members" and "every member"?

While similar, "all members" refers to the group collectively, whereas "every member" emphasizes each individual within the group. The choice depends on whether you want to highlight the group as a whole or its individual constituents.

When is it appropriate to use "all members" in formal writing?

It is appropriate to use "all members" in formal writing when you need to refer comprehensively to every individual belonging to a defined group or organization. Ensure the context is clear and the group is well-defined to avoid ambiguity.