Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(1)
Exact(6)
When all items were coded, categories and themes were derived from the codes.
All items were coded so that higher values indicated more cultural affiliation or more cultural alienation.
All items were coded as the modified GHQ6-n meabove above.
All items were coded in the same direction with the exception of item 9 "Able to do usual activities," was reverse-coded.
All items were coded as 1 (not at all), 2 (usual), 3 (somewhat more than usual), and 4 (much more than usual).
An average score of each scale is calculated to get a composite construct and all items were coded so that a higher score indicated a higher level of the construct being measured.
Similar(54)
All items are coded, scaled and transformed linearly from 0 (worst health) to 100 (best health).
An affirmative response to any item was coded as experiencing past-year physical and/or sexual IPV in the final outcome variable; while "no" to all items was coded as no IPV.
All items are coded using the same assessment approach; namely, the assessor uses all sources of information and then exercises clinical judgement as to the most appropriate answer based on standardized coding guidelines provided in the instrument's training manual.
All items are coded using the same assessment approach as for the InterRAI LTCF; namely, assessors used all sources of information and then exercised clinical judgement as to the most appropriate answer based on standardized coding guidelines provided in the instrument's training manual.
All the items were coded and scored, and the completed questionnaires were included in the data analysis set.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com