The phrase "all items were categorized" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when describing a process where items have been sorted or classified into different groups or categories.
Example: "After the inventory was taken, all items were categorized according to their type and condition."
Alternatives: "all items were classified" or "all items were sorted".
In this scoring, persons who had not completed all 12 items were categorized as missing.
All individual items were categorized into four components, from which primary outcomes originated for this study (Table 1).
The fruit and vegetable intake related parenting practices items were categorized into three dimensions (structure, responsiveness, and control) based on a parenting theory conceptual framework and dichotomized as effective/ineffective based on professional perceptions.
Labeled food items were categorized as high-calorie, low-calorie, high-fat, or low-fat foods and analyzed for change as a function of the introduction of the labels.
The proportion of studies with high quality, in which eight or more items were categorized as 'Yes' for low risk of bias, was 32.6%.
For analysis, these items were categorized in five topics: body position, camera navigation, use of instruments, laparoscopic knot tying, and other tips and tricks.
The following two items were categorized as 'Unclear' due to a lack of sufficient information to make a judgment: disease progression (item 4) and clinical review (item 12). Figure 2 Quality of diagnostic studies assessed by QUADAS.
Existing items were categorized, reviewed, and revised, creating a large pool of items that were then validated with item-response theory to allow for computer adapted testing, making the PROMIS instruments an important contribution to clinical and research practice while minimizing respondent burden.
Prey items were categorized under a stereoscope into six groups: chironomid and trichopteran larvae, snails, shrimps, zooplankton, and others.
