Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigExact(1)
The total score was calculated as the average of all items responded except for the 'general-health' question, which was treated as a stand-alone item.
Similar(59)
Items responded as "believed was correct" was excluded from all analyses.
The highly significant items responded to a unanimous consensus criterion in both rounds; the significant ones to the criteria R1 = N/A and R2 = N/A; and the non-significant items were discarded in each of the rounds.
The items responded to were randomly selected, yet equally distributed over target stimuli and fillers.
It consists of 29 items responded to on a 5-point Likert scale.
Caregiver´s burden assessed through Zarit´s Test, consisting of 22 items, responded according to Likert scale of 5 points.
For participants with missing responses on one, two or three items, the sum score was based on the summarized mean value of the items responded to.
The LPH derived from the MLHF questionnaire comprises 21 items, responded to on a 6-point Likert scale ranging from 0 'No' to 5 'Very much'.
This scale comprises four items responded on a 5-point scale from 1 = to a small extent to 5 = to a large extent.
A summary scale of the eight items, responded to on a five-point Likert scale, was constructed (theoretical range 8-40, Cronbach's alpha =.82).
Under invariance, item difficulties (see below) are independent of the sample (i.e., independent of overall ability) and person abilities are independent of the items (i.e., independent of the particular items responded to).
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com