all is capable

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "all is capable" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to express that everything has the potential to do something, but it lacks clarity and proper structure. Example: "In this universe, all is capable of change and growth."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Traction elevators the ones hanging from ropes, as opposed to dumbwaiters, or mining elevators, or those lifted by hydraulic pumps are typically borne aloft by six or eight hoist cables, each of which, according to the national elevator-safety code (and the code determines all), is capable on its own of supporting the full load of the elevator plus twenty-five per cent more weight.

The New Yorker

Traction elevators — the ones hanging from ropes, as opposed to dumbwaiters, or mining elevators, or those lifted by hydraulic pumps — are typically borne aloft by six or eight hoist cables, each of which, according to the national elevator-safety code (and the code determines all), is capable on its own of supporting the full load of the elevator plus twenty-five per cent more weight.

The New Yorker

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

All are capable of playing man coverage.

The New York Times

"All are capable of comebacks".

The New York Times

All are capable of logging extensive minutes in a pinch.

The New York Times

All were capable of harassing Bryant and making him work for his points.

The New York Times

Turtles, particularly aquatic ones, are not strongly olfactory, but all are capable of smelling.

Encyclopedia Britannica

All are capable and have their strengths, but none match Clinton's celebrity.

The New York Times

Although we aim to be readable on all possible devices and browsers, not all are capable of running the full set of features.

The Guardian

Around these slabs the chorus morph from persecutors to persecuted, reminding us that in war all are capable of atrocity, though in truth mostly confusing us.

The Guardian - Music

None of these screening tests are perfect, and all are capable of giving false-negative and false-positive test results.

Clinical Techniques in Small Animal Practice

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing potential or ability, prefer "all things are capable" or "everything is capable" to ensure grammatical correctness and clarity.

Common error

Avoid using the singular verb "is" with the plural pronoun "all". This error creates grammatical discord. Instead, use "are" to maintain subject-verb agreement: "all are capable".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all is capable" attempts to express a universal attribute or potential. However, according to Ludwig AI, it suffers from grammatical inaccuracy due to the mismatch between the plural "all" and the singular verb "is".

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

News & Media

33%

Science

33%

Encyclopedias

33%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "all is capable" aims to express a universal potential, it is grammatically flawed. As Ludwig AI indicates, the correct forms are "all are capable" or "everything is capable". The phrase has limited and disputed usage, primarily appearing in news, media, and scientific contexts. For clarity and correctness, it's best to opt for the grammatically sound alternatives. The frequency of this phrase is rare, reinforcing the recommendation to use the appropriate forms for effective communication. Favoring these alternatives ensures that your message is both clear and grammatically correct.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

everything is capable

Replaces "all" with "everything", creating a grammatically sound and universally applicable statement of potential.

all things are capable

Adds "things" to clarify that the subject is plural, resolving the original grammatical issue and emphasizing collective potential.

each is capable

Shifts the focus to the individual components within a larger set, highlighting their singular potential.

everyone is capable

Specifies that potential applies to all individuals, emphasizing personal ability.

everything has the potential

Rephrases the concept to highlight the 'potential' itself, rather than capability, and is always followed by "to".

all are able

Substitutes "capable" with "able", creating a more concise expression of inherent or demonstrated skill.

all possess the ability

Focuses on the "ability" as a possession of the subject, and always followed by "to".

everything can

Uses "can" to express a general possibility or permission related to all things.

each has the capacity

Highlights the inherent "capacity" of each element, often referring to the ability to contain or absorb something, and is always followed by "for".

all have it in them

Idiomatically suggests that everyone has the innate qualities required for a particular task or achievement.

FAQs

Is "all is capable" grammatically correct?

No, "all is capable" is not grammatically correct in standard English. The correct form is "all are capable" or "everything is capable".

What does "everything is capable" mean?

The phrase "everything is capable" means that everything has the potential or ability to do something, or to undergo change or development. It suggests a universe of possibilities.

How can I use "all are capable" in a sentence?

You can use "all are capable" to emphasize the potential within a group. For example, "In a supportive learning environment, "all are capable" of achieving their goals".

What's the difference between "everything is capable" and "all things are capable"?

While both phrases are grammatically correct and similar in meaning, "everything is capable" is more general and abstract, whereas "all things are capable" is more specific and concrete, referring to distinct entities or objects.