all identified

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "all identified" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a complete set of items or individuals that have been recognized or specified in a particular context. Example: "We have completed the review process, and all identified issues will be addressed in the next phase of the project."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

(They're all identified over the end credits).

The New York Times

"The suspects were all identified by the Metropolitan police.

The Guardian

The students in the room – including me – all identified as lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender.

The Guardian

There are five suspects – all identified by characters from the "Tinker, Tailor" jingle.

The Guardian - Books

A selection of Equus's fine cheeses made a superb ending, all identified and described intelligently.

The New York Times

All identified wells are located relatively close to each other.

Journal of Hydrology

All identified hexahedral elements are valid for engineering analysis.

Procedia Engineering

All identified cells are valid for engineering analysis.

Computer-Aided Design

The physicochemical characteristics of all identified proteins were determined.

Journal of Proteomics

b Mass error distribution of all identified peptides.

AMB Express

They are all identified with a pure cubic phase Li4Ti5O12.

Materials for Renewable and Sustainable Energy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "all identified", ensure that the context clearly defines how and by whom the identification was made for clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "all identified" without specifying the criteria or method used for identification, as this can lead to ambiguity. Provide context to clarify the basis of identification.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all identified" functions as a determiner followed by a past participle, modifying a noun to specify that all members of a group have undergone a process of identification. Ludwig's AI indicates the phrase is grammatically sound and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

68%

News & Media

28%

Formal & Business

4%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "all identified" is a grammatically correct and frequently used phrase, primarily in scientific and news contexts. Ludwig AI confirms its validity and wide applicability. The phrase effectively conveys the comprehensive nature of a specified group. To ensure clarity, provide context regarding the identification process. Alternatives like "every identified" or "all recognized" can be used depending on the desired emphasis. Avoid overgeneralization by specifying the criteria used for identification.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

every identified

Changes "all" to "every", emphasizing each individual item within the identified group.

each identified

Similar to "every identified", but can highlight the separate consideration of each item.

all recognized

Replaces "identified" with "recognized", focusing on the act of acknowledgement.

every recognized

Combines the individual emphasis of "every" with the acknowledgement aspect of "recognized".

all detected

Uses "detected" instead of "identified", suggesting the discovery of something.

every detected

Focuses on each individual item discovered or detected.

all pinpointed

Replaces "identified" with "pinpointed", emphasizing precise location or identification.

every pinpointed

Combines the individual aspect of "every" with precise pinpointing.

all cataloged

Suggests that items were "cataloged", emphasizing organization and classification.

every cataloged

Focuses on organizing/classifying each individual item.

FAQs

How can I use "all identified" in a sentence?

You can use "all identified" to refer to a group of items or individuals that have been recognized or specified. For example, "All identified risk factors were analyzed."

What are some alternatives to "all identified"?

Some alternatives include "every identified", "all recognized", or "every recognized", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "all identified issues" or "all the identified issues"?

Both are grammatically correct, but "all identified issues" is more concise and often preferred. "All the identified issues" is also acceptable and can add emphasis.

What is the difference between "all identified" and "all detected"?

"All identified" implies a formal process of recognition or specification, while "all detected" suggests the discovery of something, regardless of whether it was formally identified.