all for won

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "all for won" is not correct in written English.
It seems to be a misspelling or misphrasing of "all for one," which is a common expression. Example: "The motto of the team is 'all for one, and one for all,' emphasizing unity and teamwork."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

"I'm all for winning our next two games," Van Gundy said today.

The New York Times - Sports

He deserves all the credit for winning and even more credit for appreciating Hillary's value when the contest ended.

Huffington Post

(or he has been banned from them for winning all the time)." 1.

Vice

There is no $64,000 Bobby Fischer Memorial prize this year for winning all the games.

Huffington Post

It's me in my Irish vest with a trophy for winning the All-Ireland title.

The Guardian - Sport

He added, "Pete stood for winning, we all know that".

The New York Times - Sports

I'll bet you get all sorts of cool stuff for winning the Mystery Hunt.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The counterfactual analysis confirms the results we obtained for all bids, although the predictions for winning bids are less precise.

European Economic Review

After all, there are no points for winning quickly.

WikiHow

… I'm all for winning". That's how it's done.

The Washington Post

One point is scored for winning three or four tricks and two points for winning all five tricks ("the vole").

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When aiming for a phrase that conveys unity or shared purpose, use the idiom "all for one" instead of the ungrammatical "all for won".

Common error

Avoid substituting words in well-known idioms without understanding the original meaning. Using "won" instead of "one" changes the meaning entirely and renders the phrase nonsensical.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "all for won" is grammatically incorrect. If corrected to "all for one", it functions as an idiomatic expression signifying collective unity or shared purpose. It's often used as a motto or rallying cry.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "all for won" is an incorrect phrasing. Ludwig AI indicates that this is likely a misspelling of the idiomatic expression "all for one". This idiom is used to signify that everyone is acting as a unified group. Instead of saying "all for won", consider alternatives like "united we stand" or "in solidarity". Remember to use "all for one" when aiming to convey unity and shared goals. Because no correct examples are found, its linguistic analysis is based on the correct form.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

All for one

Corrects the grammatical error by replacing 'won' with 'one', emphasizing unity.

Together as one

Emphasizes the concept of being united as a single entity.

United we stand

Expresses solidarity and strength through collective action.

In solidarity

Highlights mutual support and shared purpose.

Shoulder to shoulder

Depicts mutual support and shared responsibility.

Collectively

Focuses on the group effort and combined action.

All in

Emphasizes full commitment and participation.

On the same page

Highlights agreement and shared understanding.

Working together

Focuses on collaborative effort.

In agreement

Highlights consensus and shared opinion.

FAQs

What does "all for one" mean, and how is it different from "all for won"?

"All for one" is an idiomatic expression meaning everyone is acting as a unified group. "All for won" is grammatically incorrect and doesn't have a recognized meaning.

How can I use "all for one" in a sentence?

You can use "all for one" to describe a team or group that is completely unified and working towards a common goal. For example, "The team's motto was 'all for one', emphasizing their collective spirit."

Are there any situations where "all for won" would be correct?

No, the phrase "all for won" is not grammatically correct in standard English. Use "all for one" to express unity.

What are some alternative ways to express the idea behind "all for one"?

Alternatives include phrases like "united we stand", "in solidarity", or "collectively", each emphasizing different aspects of unity and shared purpose.