The phrase "all favourable" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a situation or outcome that is entirely positive or advantageous.
Example: "The committee's decision was all favourable, leading to a successful project launch."
Alternatives: "entirely positive" or "completely advantageous".
Brady v Maryland held that the government had to provide the defence all favourable evidence.
The final house combines all favourable actions that manage to reduce consumption, especially during the most intense winter period.
The river drainage, the intense intermingling of waters by straits and wind, and the upwelling of deep, nutrient-laden ocean waters are all favourable to marine life.
As it was, he was dropped from all favourable mention or share in the election campaign of 1987 and was verbally assaulted when the Downing Street press secretary, Bernard Ingham, effectively discounted him as "semi-detached".
The Government has enough time to collect cross-party support, but yet most MPs won't have a chance to look at the bill in detail and instead will be relying on the recommendations (all favourable) of their party leaders.
However, early reviews of Ping have not been all favourable some claiming that it offers the same music recommendations for all users.
"I just assumed it would be all roses, like whoever came up with that for the NYPD". The NYPD tried to make the best of a botched job by retweeting all the favourable photos.
Seeing all these favourable developments the editorial board is more than optimistic that bio-impedance research will continue its successful way and further contribute to the overall prosperity of biomedical engineering.
Biomaterials can also be used in combination to incorporate all the favourable material properties in one implant.
All these favourable conditions enable us to further our research and get a deep understanding of the roles of WRKY family members in maize.
As all feasibility studies were designed as non-randomized one-arm trials they are not appropriate to assess the key question: "Does regular low-dose CT screening of subjects at risk for lung cancer actually prevent death from lung cancer?" All the favourable results discussed above could be due to different biases of the non-comparative study designs.
