Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigSuggestions(2)
Exact(3)
Not at all, corrects Smith.
Also in two of the conditions where external feedback was presented on all "corrects following corrects" (FCC100) the participants that performed the worse made more double-errors [112] r = 0.34, p < 0.05; [002] r = 0.52 p < 0.05.
For example, [101] denotes a 2-back sequence where external feedback was received on error trials as well as on 20% of the FCC trials, and [002] denotes a 2-back sequence where no external feedback is given on errors, nor the subsequent correct response, but external feedback is given on all corrects following corrects.
Similar(57)
Four questions had more than one correct answer, and were scored as correct (all correct answers identified) or incorrect (did not identify all correct answers).
— all correct".
[Laughs.] They were all correct.
Only one person got them all correct.
"What he said is all correct," she said.
Or at least, I think this is all correct.
It's time they all corrected a shameful – and unconstitutional – mistake.
Assuming this speculation is all correct then, what do you think?
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com