The phrase "alimony would be" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the potential amount or conditions of alimony in a legal or financial context.
Example: "In the event of a divorce, the court will determine how much alimony would be necessary to support the lower-earning spouse."
Alternatives: "alimony might be" or "alimony could be".
In other words, since one of the purposes of the trust was to support Wendy, Mark wanted to use those funds to reduce the amount of alimony support he would be required to pay.
You are not treated as members of the same household if one of you is preparing to leave the household and does leave no later than 1 month after the date of the payment". In other words, alimony would not be tax deductible by the payor, if they are living in the same household.
Alimony would, however, be taxed.
Besides the biological reasons, another concern for Ehrenfels is the well-being of the children in successive marriages, i.e., serial polyandry, which would destroy the trust among parents and children, as a stepfather and alimony would never be a satisfactory replacement (Ehrenfels 1907, 68).
"When I got to the Senate, I wanted to see some changes so that alimony and child support would be protected, and so I negotiated those changes and then the people who had been handling the bill said, 'Well, if we take your changes, you have to support it,'" Clinton said.
Mr. Ellman said payments under this rule would be "more generous than the alimony awards that many courts now order".
They worried that earlier laws written to protect women — guaranteeing alimony and exempting women from combat, for instance — would be jettisoned.
Instead it could purely focus on how marital property would be divided and who would receive alimony, in what amount, and for how long.
Instead it could focus on how marital property (and possibly his separate property) would be divided and who would receive alimony, in what amount and for how long.
