Sentence examples for alignment were evaluated from inspiring English sources

In a later Cohrane review by Wang et al. [8], some additional factors, including the amount of root resorption along with tooth movement and the intensity of pain experienced by patients during initial alignment, were evaluated.

Sequences in each alignment were evaluated for overlap and sequence identity.

The alignment is evaluated using the sequence dependent score: SP - score = ∑ aligned residue a, b BLOSUM 62 a, b, (1).

Improvement of alignment is evaluated by to two metrics known as morphology alignment score and correlation coefficient.

On lateral radiographs, cervical spine alignment was evaluated by SSA and SACS, and preoperative and postoperative data were compared.

METHODS: The coronal and sagittal tibial component alignment was evaluated on the postoperative weight-bearing anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs of 236 consecutive fixed-bearing TAAs.

Cervical spine alignment was evaluated by sagittal segmental alignment and sagittal alignment of the whole cervical spine preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively and at the last follow-up.

Limb alignment is evaluated fluoroscopically using a long rigid alignment rod between the centre of the femoral head and the centre of the ankle.

Cervical spine alignment was evaluated by sagittal segmental alignment (SSA) and sagittal alignment of the cervical spine (SACS) on lateral radiographs, preoperatively, 6 months postoperatively, and at the last follow-up (Fig. 1) [15 16, 16].

Each time an alignment is attempted after transformation matrices combination, the quality of the alignment is evaluated by a single point shape Tanimoto estimation via a Gaussian Grid approximation similar to ROCS, as detailed in the Methods section.

The goodness of alignment is evaluated by a distance or similarity measure ({ mathcal{S}}), such as the correlation ratio, the sum of squared differences (SSD), or the mutual information (MI).