The phrase "alignment inaccuracies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where there are errors or discrepancies in alignment, such as in technical, engineering, or design discussions.
Example: "The alignment inaccuracies in the machinery led to significant operational issues that needed to be addressed immediately."
Alternatives: "alignment errors" or "misalignment issues".
With classical histology it is rather problematic to construct accurate 3D datasets, because of section alignment inaccuracies as well as unavoidable tissue distortions resulting from fixation, embedding, cutting and staining.
To minimize beam alignment inaccuracies on the deformable mirror a CCD camera is used for improved visualization of the beam path prior to retinal imaging (not shown in Fig. 1).
Optimal catheter access to all pre-defined control points and the quality of CT segmentation and 3D CT reconstruction may constitute further reasons for observed alignment inaccuracies in the mentioned areas.
For example, several authors have shown that positive selection tests are very sensitive to alignment inaccuracies (Mallick et al. 2009; Schneider et al. 2009; Fletcher and Yang 2010; Jordan and Goldman 2012).
Although some of the variation may be attributed to technical problems like sequence quality and alignment inaccuracies (Schneider et al. 2009), the interpretation and validity of dN/ dS as a tool for locating genes affected by selection have also been questioned on theoretical grounds.
First, taking the four methods together, there is a clear relationship between the proportion of indels and the estimated d N and d S values, which is consistent with previously reported alignment inaccuracies with increasing number of indels (see previous section).
However, the above phylogenetic scoring methods require multiple alignments of orthologous genes from species being compared, and they suffer when the alignments contain inaccuracies or when the location or orientation of the TF binding sites has not been conserved (Moses et al., 2006).
It can be seen clearly that the testing errors caused by rotation inaccuracy and alignment errors of the measurements can be consequently eliminated from the differences in measurement results by the proposed method.
It implies that the testing errors caused by rotation inaccuracy and alignment errors of the measurements can be consequently eliminated from the differences in measurement results by the proposed method.
Inaccuracy of alignment leads to the blurring of each point in the image, which can be described by as a point spread function (PSF) with a Gaussian distribution.
However, comparative genomic methods are very sensitive to the quality of underlying alignments, and even slight inaccuracies may lead to artifacts in the results of comparative methods.
