The phrase "alignment differences" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing variations or discrepancies in alignment, often in contexts such as design, engineering, or data analysis.
Example: "The alignment differences between the two models resulted in significant performance issues during testing."
Alternatives: "discrepancies in alignment" or "variations in alignment".
Consequently, alignment differences could be explained by different education and point of view regarding the disease.
Manual inspection of the alignment differences (resulting, for example, from different tools, changed parameters or modifications to the reference MSA) is supported via a differencing function.
This is because alignment differences result in a greater variability of PSF volume than PSF width.
Because of the repetitive structure of terminology system rubrics, the word alignment differences were also repetitive.
In addition, due to the intrinsic biases from sequencing platforms, the alignment differences might reflect some inevitable sequencing errors.
Additionally, even in the more constrained setting of global alignment, differences in profile and block lengths permit more than one possible alignment between many blocks.
First, we assume that the alignment difference between the source and the target dictionaries causes this effect.
Alignment identity score (2) and alignment difference score (−3) were used in GS De Novo Assembler.
The final de novo assembly was constructed using a minimum overlap length of 45 nt, minimum overlap identity of 96%, and an alignment difference score of −6.
All obtained motifs were compared to each other by applying the minaligndiff function of the TAMO distribution and when motifs occur with an alignment difference < 0.2, only the motif with the highest Bit score is further considered.
We found subtle changes in the resulting assemblies, and ultimately decided to use a minimum overlap length of 45 nt, alignment difference score of −6, and a minimum overlap identity of 96%.
