The phrase "alignment criteria" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where specific standards or benchmarks are being established to ensure consistency or agreement among different elements or parties.
Example: "Before we proceed with the project, we need to define the alignment criteria to ensure all team members are on the same page."
Alternatives: "consistency standards" or "conformity benchmarks".
CQ-calculate uses stringent alignment criteria requiring the entire read to align with zero mismatches.
We applied the most robust and direct approach allowing the characterization of genome duplications that consists of aligning the available unigene set (31,798 elements) on itself using stringent alignment criteria and statistical validation described in Salse et al. [ 43].
To explore the biological functions of miRNAs in broccoli, putative target sites were identified by aligning the miRNA sequences to the ESTs of B. rapa, and adopting the alignment criteria suggested by Allen at al. [ 46] and Schwab et al. [ 48].
Given millions of sequences, the goal is to identify all pairs of sequences that are highly similar (or "homologous") on the basis of alignment criteria.
Poses are judged by detailed alignment criteria for a total of 80 points, plus ineffables like "grace" are considered.
We used equal or higher than 98% identity and 70% exon length coverage as alignment criteria to determine the match of an EST with a particular exon sequence.
We note, again, that with our alignment of mitochondrial proteins, we exclude sites between a gap and a site that is constant across the dataset, and if we applied this conservative alignment criterion, we would have to exclude all FGB-int7 sites.
Taking the partial derivatives with respect to α, we can obtain the following solution: (8) α = (V W T V W + λ Θ ) - 1 (V W T V K + λ μ ) It is easy to see that, if λ = 0, only the kernel target alignment criterion is used to optimize α, and MNet is similar to SW.
However, alignment coverage criteria failed for many hits despite good E-values.
For the second (Type2.2) and third (Type2.3) sets alignment identity criteria was relaxed to 50 and 35%% respectively [ 41].
As a start, an E value cutoff of 10-5 waselecteded for each BLAST analysis, without any alignment length criteria.
