Functional decompositions based on the intentional stance are supposed to reach a bottom, "dumb" level which can be explained mechanically; however, since Dennett now believes that neurons may need to be described intentionally, it is not clear whether our explanations of cognitive functions can ever align with our explanations of neuronal and network behaviors.
Definitions and explanations used during the interviews closely align with student definitions and explanations in response to question 1b during the homework assignment.
In other words, taking multiple videos of a high-profile public events such as the "San Diego Fireworks Fail", we want to explain what happened when (in what order) and then align these explanations with observables in the individual videos that have been created (with different view-points and different temporal offsets) of the same event.
However, these explanations do not align with the demonstrated lack of discernable ROS production.
Without considering common causes or other explanations, these results align with earlier findings supporting a bidirectionality to a migraine depression association: in crude analyses, migraine status predicted incident depression, and depression status predicted incident migraine.
The results of our study align with previous reports showing that students' explanations of natural selection largely fail to incorporate molecular genetic concepts like genetic variation and heredity (Nehm and Schonfeld, 2008; Nehm and Ridgway, 2011; Bray Speth et al., 2009; Nieswandt and Bellomo, 2009).
What we found roughly aligned with the police explanation.
"The bulk of the evidence is now clearly aligned with a human explanation for the [Australian] event," agrees Gifford Miller, a geochronologist at the University of Colorado, Boulder.
"Playgrounds align with that".
"Does it align with our major?
