Your English writing platform
Discover LudwigThe phrase "algorithm was useful for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the effectiveness or applicability of an algorithm in a specific context or task.
Example: "The algorithm was useful for optimizing the search results in our database."
Alternatives: "algorithm proved beneficial for" or "algorithm was effective in".
Exact(1)
The Maxent species habitat modeling algorithm was useful for identifying forest areas most likely to be converted and the most important factors associated with deforestation.
Similar(59)
Simulation of Markov chain samples using the Metropolis–Hastings algorithm is useful for reliability estimation.
Beyond directly improving biclusters, this algorithm is useful for drawing additional information out of each bicluster and using it to train a classifier.
The Euclidean algorithm is useful for reducing a common fraction to lowest terms.
Thus, the proposed algorithm is useful for providing good design solutions in reliable communication.
This algorithm is useful for not only abnormal situation correction but also plant wide controller design.
Our SGILD algorithm is useful for geophysics, biochemics, nanometer-material, and nanometer physics, etc., sciences and engineering.
Although the selective collapse algorithm is useful for the big data reduction, the empirical evidences are still lacking in the literature.
This algorithm is useful for generating only the optimal path between any two nodes, and cannot generate other candidates paths between the two nodes [2].
This algorithm is useful for microcalcification detection.
Such hybridization with a global optimization algorithm is useful for non-convex problems containing several local minima and can be done in many ways [ 17, 39, 40].
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com