Exact(2)
The algorithm is conceived to avoid any transport equation for ϕ and to confine the Level-Set function to the role of a mere post-processing tool; thus, all the numerical diffusion problems usually affecting the Level-Set methodology are removed.
The algorithm is conceived as an iterative process that decides the new SPI values based on an estimate of the QoE per service in the previous iteration (hereafter referred to as optimization loop).
Similar(58)
The ASMOOTH algorithm was conceived and developed by Harald Ebeling, David White and Vijay Rangarajan.
The algorithm was conceived by A.Velten, T.W., O.G., and R.R. and implemented and optimized by A.Velten, T.W., O.G., A.Veeraraghavan, and R.R.
Such an algorithm was conceived in order to improve the performance of ANN-based software, when relatively small datasets have to be processed.
The algorithm was conceived with two nested loops.
Yet another new method, termed as the RBB algorithm, was conceived to solve these problems.
An HLA-specific primer-design algorithm was conceived to facilitate the search for forward and reverse HLA allele-specific primers that would satisfy a number of requirements such as a 3' base difference, 21-mer length, melting temperature of 66°C, amplified fragment length of 70-120 bp and no cross-reactivity with other alleles in the HLA database.
Originally, the algorithm was conceived to predict missing expression values in gene regulatory networks, but given all the expression values of a GRN, it could be applied to contextualize the network.
The proposed algorithm was conceived as a critical piece of an emerging data processing "pipeline" that will eventually accept time series and other data characterizing biological pathways and more or less automatically propose topological and regulatory structures that are consistent with the input data.
For solving the subproblem of Bregman iterative method (2.2), different algorithms were conceived in [27, 32, 33], however, these methods have to perform significant iterations for solving the subproblem.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com