This is an alert-centric evaluation of VALs.
Improvement is seen in both eruption-centric and alert-centric evaluations, and suggests improvement in the monitoring networks and also an increasing willingness to issue alerts even if unrest may not lead to eruption.
Failure to reach a robust alert state for evaluation may be informative of attention-associated problems.
In order to facilitate the DM process evaluation, alerts were generated based on well-defined rules.
Programmability of redundant vs. single transmissions was not available, though potentially useful for prioritizing notifications e.g. system-related alerts demanding rapid evaluation vs. less serious conditions e.g. some recurrent arrhythmias.
The patient was post-ictal, but became arousable and alert during the initial evaluation.
IC, PC and PD defined the alert functionality and the evaluation schema.
We have also discussed the challenges and benefits of using naturalistic or experimental studies in the evaluation of alerts and suggested appropriate outcome measures.
Customization to the setting in which the system is used (the 'use environment') could provide an opportunity to eliminate inappropriate alerts and requires further evaluation.
Some altogether exclude inaccurate alerts from their evaluations, instead scoring dog teams only on how well they find drugs hidden in cars and rooms.
