The phrase "alarms range" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to refer to the range or distance at which alarms can be activated or detected, but it lacks clarity.
Example: "The alarms range is set to cover a distance of 100 meters around the perimeter."
Alternatives: "alarm range" or "range of alarms".
The percentage of homes with functioning smoke alarms ranges from 34%-93 34%-93 high-risk communities (Liu et al. [2011]).
People are fined $50 for a third false alarm within a 12-month period, with fines for subsequent false alarms ranging from $100 to $500.
People are fined $50 for a third false alarm call within a 12-month period, with fines for subsequent false alarms ranging from $100 to $500.
To investigate the effect of different pulse oximetry (SpO2) target range settings during automated fraction of inspired oxygen control (A-FiO2) on time spent within a clinically set SpO2 alarm range in oxygen-dependent infants on noninvasive respiratory support.
All multiple comparisons were significant after adjustment for repeated testing for the false alarm range 0 0.005 (all p ≤ 0.005).
Main reasons for non-purchase were: cost (77 %), limited alarm range (51 %), no need (39 %) and lack of suitable contacts (30%%).
Comparison of the weighted AUC analyses for the seven cusum algorithms found no significant difference for the 0 0.005 false alarm range (Friedman χ2 = 10.7, p = 0.10).
The alarm ranges from the histrionic to the philosophical in this resort that is in season for a precious 10 weeks -- from the third week of December to the end of February -- and then reverts to a virtual ghost town by April.
However, no multiple comparisons were significant after adjustment for repeated testing for the false alarm ranges 0 1 (all 0.17 ≤ p ≤ 0.85), and 0 0.01 (C1 all p ≤ 0.02, C2 all p ≤ 0.08, C3 all p ≤ 1.00).
Comparison of the AUC analyses for the seven cusum algorithms found a significant difference for the 0 1, 0 0.01, and the 0 0.005 false alarm ranges (Friedman χ2 = 70.3, p < 0.0001, Friedman χ2 = 70.6, p < 0.0001 and Friedman χ2 = 61.9, p < 0.0001 respectively, Table 3).
