The phrase "alarm range" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts related to security systems, alarms, or monitoring devices to refer to the distance or area within which an alarm can detect or respond to an event.
Example: "The alarm range of the security system is set to cover a radius of 100 meters around the property."
Alternatives: "detection range" or "alert range".
To investigate the effect of different pulse oximetry (SpO2) target range settings during automated fraction of inspired oxygen control (A-FiO2) on time spent within a clinically set SpO2 alarm range in oxygen-dependent infants on noninvasive respiratory support.
All multiple comparisons were significant after adjustment for repeated testing for the false alarm range 0 0.005 (all p ≤ 0.005).
Main reasons for non-purchase were: cost (77 %), limited alarm range (51 %), no need (39 %) and lack of suitable contacts (30%%).
Comparison of the weighted AUC analyses for the seven cusum algorithms found no significant difference for the 0 0.005 false alarm range (Friedman χ2 = 10.7, p = 0.10).
The alarm ranges from the histrionic to the philosophical in this resort that is in season for a precious 10 weeks -- from the third week of December to the end of February -- and then reverts to a virtual ghost town by April.
However, no multiple comparisons were significant after adjustment for repeated testing for the false alarm ranges 0 1 (all 0.17 ≤ p ≤ 0.85), and 0 0.01 (C1 all p ≤ 0.02, C2 all p ≤ 0.08, C3 all p ≤ 1.00).
Comparison of the AUC analyses for the seven cusum algorithms found a significant difference for the 0 1, 0 0.01, and the 0 0.005 false alarm ranges (Friedman χ2 = 70.3, p < 0.0001, Friedman χ2 = 70.6, p < 0.0001 and Friedman χ2 = 61.9, p < 0.0001 respectively, Table 3).
With the exception of the comparison of EARS C3 and the 7-day negative binomial cusum (p = 0.01 and p = 0.04 respectively), all multiple comparisons were significant after adjustment for repeated testing for the false alarm ranges 0 1 and 0 0.01 (all p ≤ 0.002).
Personal security alarms range from simple 'shriek' devices, designed to shock or disorientate an attacker to give victims time to get away, to a component in a monitored system (as above).
The percentage of homes with functioning smoke alarms ranges from 34%-93 34%-93 high-risk communities (Liu et al. [2011]).
People are fined $50 for a third false alarm within a 12-month period, with fines for subsequent false alarms ranging from $100 to $500.
