The phrase "aims at quickly" is not correct as it stands and lacks clarity in written English.
It can be used in contexts where you want to express a goal or intention to achieve something in a fast manner, but it needs to be restructured for clarity.
Example: "The project aims at quickly improving the efficiency of our operations."
Alternatives: "intends to do so rapidly" or "seeks to achieve swiftly."
The Family Life Academy Charter School in the South Bronx, which plans a bilingual program aimed at quickly assimilating native Spanish speakers, was modified to better serve native English speakers.
HONOLULU -- Hawaii lawmakers advanced a bill Tuesday that would establish a "mobile court" aimed at quickly adjudicating some misdemeanor cases in which defendants, many of them homeless, often fail to show up to the court.
The contests were aimed at quickly achieving widespread sustainable results.
This informal searching differs from the more formal searching process in step 2 in that it is more exploratory and aimed at quickly identifying the range of possible explanatory theories that may be relevant.
Since ordering of search space in our MCS algorithm aims at more quickly improving the candidate solution at an earlier age, the result of progress optimization will be close to the optimal result at an earlier stage and it will stabilize sooner to an acceptable result.
The lawmakers may then propose legislation aimed at more quickly moving potential treatments from the lab to the clinic.
Innovative epidemiologic research designs aimed at more quickly providing provisional information are also needed to advance understanding of long-term developmental processes.
After all, those tiny, standalone apps that can be installed on any web page are inherently viral, aimed at spreading quickly across blogs, social networks and other places.
After 366 migrants died off the coast of Lampedusa last autumn, the European Commission set up Eurosur, a surveillance operation aimed at reacting more quickly to boats in distress.
Asked to explain, Mr. Hatch argued that a federal bench that was less than full strength could not process warrants and subpoenas aimed at terrorists as quickly as it should.
