The phrase "aids improve" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing the positive effects or benefits of aids in a specific context, such as health or technology.
Example: "Recent studies show that various aids improve the quality of life for individuals with disabilities."
Alternatives: "assistance enhances" or "tools boost".
Our study also investigated whether visual aids improve risk comprehension in surgeons with limited numeracy.
A recent systematic review has concluded that decision aids improve participants' knowledge of the options available and perceptions that decision-making is informed [ 12].
[ 27] Systematic reviews have shown that decision aids improve patient knowledge and values clarity, and increase the likelihood of making decisions [ 27].
While there is evidence to show that decision aids improve key indicators of patients' decision quality, relatively little is known about physicians' acceptance of decision aids or factors that influence their decision to use them.
Our findings are consistent with prior systematic reviews, which suggest that decision aids improve patient knowledge, increase the likelihood of making decisions, and improve patient-provider discussion [ 27, 39].
Interventions such as decision coaching and patient decision aids improve adult patients' participation in health decisions, knowledge and decision quality but little is known about their ability to facilitate shared decision making with children [ 8, 9].
Magic Angle Coil Spinning (MACS) aids improving the intrinsically low NMR sensitivity of heterogeneous microscopic samples.
In a study by Palmer et al (1999), the use of hearing aids improved scores on the BEHAVE-AD.
This agrees with a systematic review, which also showed that decision aids improved patient involvement, knowledge, and realistic expectation of benefits and harms [ 62].
Our findings are similar to those reported in trials that have evaluated decision aids in a variety of clinical settings: decision aids improved knowledge and decreased decisional conflict [ 32].
The meta-analysis also showed that for nine trials comparing decision aids and usual care, decision aids improved average knowledge scores by 18.75 points (out of 100) (95%CI 13.1 to 24.4, median standard deviation 20)[ 48].
