The phrase "agrobiodiversity conservation" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in discussions related to environmental science, agriculture, and sustainability, particularly when referring to the preservation of biodiversity in agricultural systems.
Example: "The government has implemented several initiatives aimed at agrobiodiversity conservation to ensure the sustainability of our food systems."
Alternatives: "biodiversity preservation in agriculture" or "conservation of agricultural biodiversity."
It can also help to design policy instruments for in situ agrobiodiversity conservation.
This paper discusses the institutional issues involved in establishing market-like mechanisms for agrobiodiversity conservation.
This paper provides insights into the multiple dimensions of fairness in payments for ecosystem services (PES) using the results of pilot agrobiodiversity conservation auctions.
Based on the results obtained, the most favorable mosaic systems for agrobiodiversity conservation were identified as well as those subsystems that require special management to solve problems of habitat degradation.
The potential gains to society from their use with regard to agrobiodiversity conservation are discussed and some illustrative examples involving their application in different parts of the world are also described.
We argue that the analysis of the context of application of intellectual property rights can provide better guidance for the future development of appropriate institutional alternatives to face the problems of in situ agrobiodiversity conservation and for a more equitable distribution of controlled hybridisation technologies and molecular biology research tools in plant improvement.
In doing so it has altered once again the management of agrobiodiversity in terms of conservation and use possibilities, as well as the landscape of actors involved.
The importance of homegardens for the conservation of agrobiodiversity, the maintenance of farm ecosystem processes, and the economic and food security of rural populations worldwide is increasingly recognized.
High levels of natural capital (e.g. indicators of wildland biodiversity conservation and agrobiodiversity for human needs) were positively associated with indicators of human capital, including knowledge of the flora and fauna and knowledge sharing among farmers.
In addition to the main vertically integrated innovation chain producing improved varieties, mass selection operated on farms by farmers cannot thus be overlooked as an innovation system contributing to the conservation and sustainable use of agrobiodiversity, whilst also truly ensuring the subsistence of millions of farmers based on principles of open access and informal exchanges.
Although concerted efforts are being made to promote the sustainable use and management of this agrobiodiversity, there need to have a multi-stakeholder approach so that conservation efforts are successful, a role that is currently played by the SADC Plant Genetic Resources Centre in Southern African conservation of agrobiodiversity.
