The phrase "agreements would need" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing requirements or conditions that must be met regarding agreements in various contexts, such as legal, business, or personal matters.
Example: "For the project to proceed, the agreements would need to be finalized by the end of the month."
Alternatives: "agreements must be" or "agreements should require".
New agreements would need to be enacted for air services with Canada and the US.
In its announcement last month, the Justice Department suggested that writers with such agreements would need to renegotiate those deals.
Netflix's rights agreements would need to be renegotiated and would only get trickier if the company paired up with cable providers, analysts said.
He points out that similar agreements would need a savvy client who can keep a close eye on what contractors are getting up to something that the government is not famous for.
The addition of sharper distinctions between a country's income levels and their responsibilities to the agreements would need to be ratified this year.
This rendered the governance potential of the agreement effectively null, with renewed efforts at reconciliation between the parties repeatedly falling through.34 In addition, the agreements would need to include specific provision for subsistence rights in order to make sure that their protection during humanitarian crises would be provided for.
To take effect, a new agreement would need to be ratified by lawmakers in both countries.
Such an agreement would need to be written into the Energy Bill currently going through Parliament.
The price of an agreement would need to be set very high for it to work out.
In a June 2 videoconference with Mr. Maliki, the president emphasized that any agreement would need to be ratified by the Iraqi Parliament.
In announcing its move, H&M said that "in order to make an impact and be sustainable," the agreement "would need a broad coalition of brands".
